Dover dog owner ordered to pay £900 for not updating pet's microchip details
12:52, 06 April 2023
A pet owner told the council his dog had died - only for it to be picked up as a stray by the dog warden.
Charlie May, 22, has been ordered to pay more than £900 after failing to update the details of his dog’s microchip.
He claimed the dog had died after being hit by a car, when in reality it had a new owner.
An investigation - and subsequent prosecution - was lead by Dover District Council (DDC).
The authority says the investigation began following the retrieval of a stray dog by police in Coldred on August 2.
The dog had a microchip implanted but the keeper’s details were out of date.
Mr May was confirmed as the keeper of the dog and collected the dog from the warden on August 23.
He was served with a Notice in accordance with Regulation 12(a) of the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015 requiring him to update keeper’s details on the dog’s microchip within 21 days.
By September 20, the contact details had not been updated and DDC wrote to Mr May on September 22, asking him a series of written interview under caution questions.
Mr May had not replied by October 24, and a subsequent check of the microchipping database on October 25 revealed the details had still not been updated.
A final interview letter was sent to Mr May on October 26.
No reply was forthcoming, and further checks of the microchipping database in November and December showed the details were still not up to date for the keeper of the dog.
Mr May eventually contacted DDC on March 6 in response to a court summons at which time he informed the council the dog had died after being hit by a car.
However, on March 14, Mr May’s dog was picked up by the dog warden as a stray.
When contacted, Mr May admitted he had not updated the details on the microchip and that he had given the dog to someone else.
Mr May, of Old Folkestone Road, Dover, did not attend court but pleaded guilty to the offence at Folkestone Magistrates Court at the end of March.
He was fined £377 and ordered to pay costs of £375 and a victim surcharge of £151.
Latest news
‘I spend three hours at A&E every other day because my GP can’t see me’
Rolexes and crypto: How dealer selling drugs from bedroom hid ‘massive profits’
Park pledges to reopen iconic cinema building as another blockbuster film lined up
High street’s oldest shop to finally reopen 18 months after roof collapsed
Features
Most popular
- 1
Pedestrian killed in M2 crash involving ‘number of vehicles’
3 - 2
‘This Christmas market is truly magical - but there’s just one problem’
17 - 3
Inside Kent’s newest B&M store in former Wilko
5 - 4
Lorry bursts into flames on roundabout approach
3 - 5
Delays after tank strapped to lorry hits railway bridge
6