Kent Police staff had 170 cases of misconduct and gross misconduct made against them
00:01, 23 September 2015
Staff at Kent Police faced a total of 170 allegations of misconduct over a one-year period, it's been revealed.
Between April 2014 and March this year, there were claims of discreditable conduct and breaches in duties, responsibilities, honesty, integrity, authority, respect and courtesy.
Police staff including sergeants, constables, inspectors and community support officers (PCSOs) were among employees who faced proceedings, with many answering to more than one allegation.
In total, there were 30 allegations made against officers for breaching honesty and integrity. Four of these were constables who were dismissed as a result of the hearing and one was at inspector level or above.
Two other constables were accused of failing to act with honesty and integrity, with one resigning before the misconduct charge came about and the other resigned during the investigation.
Since then, the Home Office has brought in regulations which say those involved in disciplinary proceedings should be held accountable and are no longer able to resign during the investigation.
Government guidelines also say officers should act with self-control and tolerance, treating members of the public and colleagues with respect and courtesy.
But officers in Kent were alleged to have breached this responsibility on 14 occasions. Four officers were dismissed as a result, with one other being given a final warning.
Out of the 40 alleged cases of discreditable conduct - brought against any officer who "undermines public confidence" and harms the force's reputation - four officers resigned during the investigation, three resigned before the misconduct charge and one retired during the probe.
There were also 22 reported cases of officers neglecting their duties and responsibilities.
Two of the officers were dismissed, and four were given written warnings.
As well as disciplinary proceedings, the public can now access documents of criminal cases against officers.
"Officers are expected to serve with the utmost integrity, honour and pride in keeping with the standards of professional behaviour and the code of ethics" - Kent Police
In the last year two officers were accused of common assault, but no action was taken.
Two officers were also caught speeding and as a result, fined and given penalty points - but they still serve with the police.
A special constable had a case to answer for grievous bodily harm and common assault, but resigned before the hearing.
A police spokesman said: "Officers are expected to serve with the utmost integrity, honour and pride in keeping with the standards of professional behaviour and the code of ethics.
"When their actions are called into question it is only right that a full investigation is carried out to establish the full circumstances. Any officer who has fallen short of the high standards expected will be subject to scrutiny.
"Our professional standards team has a strict protocol to follow when carrying out an internal investigation, which would run alongside any criminal proceedings if they were necessary.
"The focus on the investigation will be to deal with any crime or misconduct but equally to allow officers to learn from their mistakes and develop professionally.
"To be open and accountable to the public all information regarding police misconduct is published on our website.
"It is important to note that the overwhelming majority of police officers and staff serve with the commitment and dedication that Kent residents expect and deserve.”