Find local news in Kent

Home   News   National   Article

Lammy hits out as Russia vetoes UK-backed Sudan ceasefire plan

17:18, 18 November 2024

updated: 18:02, 18 November 2024

Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Russia was ‘the enemy of peace’ after it vetoed a call for a ceasefire in Sudan (Lucy North/PA)

Foreign Secretary David Lammy said it was a “disgrace” that Russia had blocked a United Nations call for a ceasefire in Sudan.

Mr Lammy chaired a UN Security Council session on a joint UK-Sierra Leone draft resolution calling for a national ceasefire, the protection of civilians and the unrestricted passage of aid.

But Russia used its veto to block the proposal, accusing the UK of “neo-colonialism”.

Mr Lammy said the “mean, nasty and cynical veto sends a message to the warring parties that they can act with impunity”.

He said: “Shame on (Vladimir) Putin for using his mercenaries to spread conflict and violence across the African continent.

“And shame on Putin for pretending to be a partner of the Global South while condemning black Africans to further killing, further rape, further starvation in a brutal civil war.”

The UK has announced it will double its aid for people in Sudan and those who have fled to neighbouring countries from £113 million to £226 million.

The war in Sudan started in April 2023 when simmering tensions between its military and paramilitary leaders broke out in the capital Khartoum and spread to other regions including Darfur.

Mr Lammy said: “One country stood in the way of the council speaking with one voice.

One country is the blocker. One country is the enemy of peace
Foreign Secretary David Lammy

“One country is the blocker. One country is the enemy of peace.

“This Russian veto is a disgrace and it shows to the world yet again Russia’s true colours.”

At the Security Council session in New York, Russia’s first deputy permanent representative to the UN Dmitry Polyanskiy fiddled with his phone as Mr Lammy berated him.

In his response, Mr Polyanskiy said Mr Lammy’s speech was “an excellent demonstration of British neo-colonialism” and the UK’s stance was “nothing but an attempt to give themselves an opportunity to meddle in Sudanese affairs”.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More